2009-03-05 19:01:35

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 19:01:35 und 2009-03-05 19:01:54

hinzugef�gt:

http://ns.softwiki.de/req/ provides this Version 1.02

entfernt:

http://ns.softwiki.de/req/ provides this version

2009-03-05 18:58:21

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 18:58:21 und 2009-03-05 19:01:35

hinzugef�gt:

Version 1.02 (current work) – extention for Soft Wiki? Prototype 2

entfernt:

http://aksw.org/schema/SWORE/102 Version 1.02 (current work) – extention for Soft Wiki? Prototype 2

2009-03-05 18:52:42

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 18:52:42 und 2009-03-05 18:58:21

hinzugef�gt:

entfernt:

<table>

2009-03-05 18:50:46

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 18:50:46 und 2009-03-05 18:52:42

hinzugef�gt:

entfernt:

2009-03-05 18:49:01

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 18:49:01 und 2009-03-05 18:50:46

hinzugef�gt:

entfernt:

2009-03-05 18:47:35

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2009-03-05 18:47:35 und 2009-03-05 18:49:01

hinzugef�gt:

entfernt:

2008-07-22 14:41:02

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2008-07-22 14:41:02 und 2009-03-05 18:47:35

hinzugef�gt:

SoftWiki Ontology for Requirements Engineering (SWORE)

Namespace: http://ns.softwiki.de/req/

Download SWORE (Version 1.02)

Download SWORE (Version 0.08)

About the two Versions

Version 0.8 – published in [6], [7] and used in Soft Wiki? Prototype 1
http://aksw.org/schema/SWORE/102 Version 1.02 (current work) – extention for Soft Wiki? Prototype 2
http://ns.softwiki.de/req/ provides this version

The following partners participated in the development: Dirk Fritsch, Jens Lehmann, Kim Lauenroth, Steffen Lohmann, Thomas Riechert and Sebastian Dietzold
The figure visualises the core of the RE ontology, which we developed in accordance with [2,3,4,5]. Central to our approach are the classes Stakeholder and Abstract Requirement as well as the properties details and defines. Abstract requirements have the subclasses Goal, Scenario, and Requirement, each of which are defined by stakeholders and can be detailed by other abstract requirements. This enables the specification of abstract requirements at different levels of granularity. We emphasise the collaborative aspects of requirements engineering by integrating discussions amongst the stakeholders and voting (with the criteria of agreement and importance) in the model. In the RE process this documentation is often relevant for future decisions.

[1] S�ren Auer, Klaus-Peter F�hnrich, and Thomas Riechert. SoftWiki � Agiles Requirements-Engineering fur Softwareprojekte mit einer gro�en Anzahl verteilter Stakeholder. In GeNeMe� 06 � Gemeinschaft in neuen Medien, 2006.
[2] Peter Haumer, Klaus Pohl, and Klaus Weidenhaupt. Requirements elicitation and validation with real world scenes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(12):1036�1054, December 1998.
[3] Klaus Pohl. Process-centered requirements engineering. Research Studies Press, Advanced Software Development, 1996.
[5] Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE�01), pages 249�263. IEEE Computer Society Press, August 2001
[6] Riechert, T.; Lauenroth, K.; Lehmann, J.: SWORE – Soft Wiki? Ontology for Requirements Engineering. In: Auer, S.; Bizer, C.; M�ller, C.; Zhdanova, A (Hrsg.) Proceedings of the First Conference on Social Semantic Web (CSSW 2007), SABRE. LNCS, 2007.
[7] Riechert, T.; Lauenroth, K.; Lehmann, J.; Auer, S.: Towards Semantic based Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th Intl. Conference on Knowledge Management, I-KNOW�07, 5�7 September, Graz, Austria, 2007.

entfernt:

SoftWiki Ontology for Requirements Engineering (SWORE)

In the development of the basic version the following partners participated:
Dirk Fritsch, Jens Lehmann, Kim Lauenroth, Steffen Lohmann, Thomas Riechert
The figure visualises the core of the RE ontology, which we developed in ac-
cordance with [2,3,4,5]. Central to our approach are the classes Stakeholder and
Abstract Requirement as well as the properties details and defines. Abstract re-
quirements have the subclasses Goal, Scenario, and Requirement, each of which
are defined by stakeholders and can be detailed by other abstract requirements.
This enables the specification of abstract requirements at different levels of gran-
ularity. We emphasise the collaborative aspects of requirements engineering by
integrating discussions amongst the stakeholders and voting (with the criteria of
agreement and importance) in the model. In the RE process this documentation
is often relevant for future decisions.

Next Generation

SWORE Version 1.00?
[1] Soren Auer, Klaus-Peter F�hnrich, and Thomas Riechert.
SoftWiki � Agiles Requirements-Engineering fur Softwareprojekte mit einer gro�en Anzahl verteilter
Stakeholder. In GeNeMe� 06 � Gemeinschaft in neuen Medien, 2006.
[2] Peter Haumer, Klaus Pohl, and Klaus Weidenhaupt. Requirements elicitation and
validation with real world scenes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,
24(12):1036�1054, December 1998.
[3] Klaus Pohl. Process-centered requirements engineering. Research Studies Press,
Advanced Software Development, 1996.
[5] Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In
Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE�01), pages
249�263. IEEE Computer Society Press, August 2001

Files

current version of OWL file (from subversion)
softwiki_req_model_0.6.owl
OWL-Doc OWL-Doc

2007-10-24 11:04:30

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2007-10-24 11:04:30 und 2008-07-22 14:41:02

hinzugef�gt:

Next Generation

SWORE Version 1.00?

2007-10-24 10:54:22

Vergleich von /SWORE vom 2007-10-24 10:54:22 und 2007-10-24 11:04:30

hinzugef�gt:

current version of OWL file (from subversion)

entfernt:

Current Version (from subversion

SoftWiki - SWORE

2009-03-05 19:01:35

2009-03-05 18:58:21

2009-03-05 18:52:42

2009-03-05 18:50:46

2009-03-05 18:49:01

2009-03-05 18:47:35

2008-07-22 14:41:02

SoftWiki Ontology for Requirements Engineering (SWORE)

SoftWiki Ontology for Requirements Engineering (SWORE)

Next Generation

Files

2007-10-24 11:04:30

Next Generation

2007-10-24 10:54:22